.
Feedback

Discharging Illegal Fireworks, Liability for Injuries

How Connecticut courts treat certain ultra-hazardous activities.

            Unfortunately, everywe hear about accidents involving fireworks, and this year was no different. In Guilford, CT a man lost two fingers and a thumb as a result of illegal fireworks, according to police. A question was posed to me this week about liability involving fireworks in Connecticut. I was asked: "who would be responsible for injuries resulting from the illegal discharge of fireworks?"

The Courts in Connecticut recognize the doctrine of strict liability for and imposes it in limited circumstances. In strict liability cases, just as in negligence, a defendant’s activity must be the proximate cause, or the actual cause that is a substantial factor in the claimed harm, thereby causing the injury.

In Connecticut, strict liability was originally reserved for ultra-hazardous activities such as blasting and explosives. This category was later extended to pile driving and experiments involving highly volatile chemicals. In 2000, the case of Lipka v. DiLungo extended strict liability to the illegal discharge of fireworks.

In a strict liability case, the Plaintiff is not required to establish that his loss was caused by the . It is sufficient to merely show that the Defendant engaged in an ultra-hazardous activity that caused the Plaintiff’s loss.

The Connecticut Supreme Court in Caporale v. C. W. Blakeslee & Sons, Inc. stated that in order to impose liability without fault, the following factors had to be present:

  1. An instrumentality capable of producing harm;
  2. Circumstances and conditions in its use which, irrespective of lawful purpose or due care, involve a risk of probable injury to such a degree that the activity fairly can be said to be intrinsically dangerous to the person or property of others; and
  3. A causal relation between the activity and the injury for which damages are claimed.

So, if someone is injured through the illegal discharge of fireworks then liability would attach to the Defendant by virtue of strict liability.

Richard P. Hastings is a Connecticut personal injury lawyer at Hastings, Cohan & Walsh, LLP, with offices throughout the state.  A graduate of Fordham Law School, he has been named a Connecticut Super Lawyer and is the author of the books: "The Crash Course on Child Injury Claims"; "The Crash Course on Personal Injury Claims in Connecticut" and "The Crash Course on Motorcycle Accidents."  He can be reached at 1(888)CTLAW-00 or by visiting www.hcwlaw.com.

 

 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Ridgefield Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Porter Gladstone III May 24, 2013 at 07:42 pm
MAc Thunder Hill believes that anyone who has had a drink -spends his day on a bar stool and doesRead More nothing else? Obama smoke pot-- lets minimize his endeavors to 'sitting around smoking pot' We more or less can understand who Obama's base is. It's people who think dignity to the white house is a desecration of the constitution --an assault on the first amendment, 2nd amendment, 10th amendment----as well as a push to sidestep the balance of powers by ignoring the laws passed in congress and then denigrating the Supreme Court on the basis they may disagree with his power grab. And hey--we had prisoners who were waterboarded--which totally took away dignity from the white house. This PResident just decides he can kill Americans overseas---no need for trials (4 of them that they admitted to)--so yeah -thats totally what this country is for-- we no longer worry about arrests and trials -we just presume guilt and kill them . Yeee HAA cowboy obama.
MAC May 24, 2013 at 07:17 pm
I believe most Americans would rather have JOBS, a growing economy, lower fuel and energy prices,Read More "transparency," a government (and president) which does not use thuggery and naked power--UNLAWFULLY--to TARGET and discriminate against taxpaying Americans, a competent foreign policy and CIC who helps keep Americans SAFE, which is potus' prime responsibility! They disagree with you and your silly, distorted view of "dignity" in the WH. A president like O, who is in perpetual campaign mode, who is an angry narcissist, whose daily "work" schedule usually starts around 10:30 or 11 a.m. and ends soon after lunch and photo ops--and who bows to foreign kings and sheiks--hardly qualifies as bringing "dignity" to the presidency!
Thunder Hill May 24, 2013 at 01:50 pm
I disagree. I think Obama does a pretty good job. For one thing, he's brought dignity back to theRead More Whitehouse. Would you really be pleased if your children grew up to be like George Bush? I mean look at the man. Ten years before he was President he was sitting on a bar stool doing nothing with his life. Now after his Presidency, he's an artist painting pictures of himself in the shower. Gimme a break. Through some fluke of nature, somewhere in between there he became President of the United States. You couldn't make this stuff up, but that doesn't make it any less embarrassing. Thank goodness Obama came along and gave America some dignity.
Lisa Buchman (Editor) May 23, 2013 at 04:02 pm
Amanda Johnson says the light is out on 35 going toward Route 7 where you can turn at Limestone orRead More Havaland.
Porter Gladstone III May 23, 2013 at 10:32 pm
Way to go lawn sprayers Thunder hill is just a constant whiner.
Thunder Hill May 23, 2013 at 01:16 pm
People, stop spraying your lawns with chemicals! Cancer rates in CT are higher than other states.Read More That's because we have the money to spray our lawns and turn them into green perfection. But it can kill you and your kids. Just stop it already. Is your grass more important than the health of your family?
Porter Gladstone III May 24, 2013 at 07:35 pm
Thunder Hill? You mean so you make sense? As in --when you write complaints on 5 other threads,Read More yet then distill another person's comments as not worthy of consideration -to be just 'whining?' Lisa --i dont think we should discriminate on the basis of age. But maybe we should place a threshold of 88 IQ to be able to post? That might make sense--- a lot more sense than one guy I see making absurd commentary anyway?
Thunder Hill May 24, 2013 at 01:53 pm
Lisa, with the new Patch format, maybe you should think about setting a minimum age requirement.
Porter Gladstone III May 23, 2013 at 10:34 pm
"ignore the whiners" haha--dude-- thats all you do
Porter Gladstone III May 23, 2013 at 10:32 pm
nice job boe thunder hill whines about everything
Thunder Hill May 23, 2013 at 01:13 pm
No money for the classrooms? A shame. Ridgefield's BOE just donated $25,000 of taxpayer money toRead More yet another artificial turf field. Gee, that works out to about $480 per classroom - exactly what the teachers have to spend out of their pockets on YOUR kids. Lesson: Money for sports? Yes. Money for the classroom. No.
CLD May 21, 2013 at 11:51 pm
Tell Erin I'm in! What a super strong kid!