patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Malloy Proposes Plan to Close State Pension Gap

The governor is working to fully fund the plan by 2032, according to the Associated Press.

 

Gov. Dannel Malloy announced a proposal on Monday that would allow the state's employee pension system, which contains less than 48 percent of its necessary funds, to be fully funded by 2032, according to the Associated Press.

Malloy is proposing that the state increase its contribution to the fund by $125 million next year and subsequent years, which will allow the fund to achieve 80 percent funding in 2025 and 100 percent funding in 2032. He will announce to the General Assembly next month how he plans to cover the first payment.

“Let’s put what we’re doing another way — too many people wait until they are older to start saving for their retirement, and as a result they have to make large payments at the end in order to make it work, Malloy said in a statement released by his office. "What we’re announcing today is basically like starting a 401k when you’re young, and getting some of the work done earlier.”

Malloy told reporters in Hartford on Monday that his announcement had nothing to do with Moody's downgrade of Connecticut's bond rating, according to the Associated Press.

The issue of employee pension funding in southern Fairfield County has affected its towns and cities quite differently. While Stamford Mayor Michael Pavia told Patch in 2010 that his city's funds are "fully funded," Trumbull has had to modify its plan to fill a large gap.

Luca Duff Cruz

5:26 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012

WOW!!
Now Im impressed!!
He plans to close the gap by ...(drum roll) putting money into it.
Where will he get the money? Shhh..dont bother with that--he just needs to tell us he will put money into the fund. There is no reason to actually find ways to cut the obligations--because that would mean he would hold public unions partially to pay for the underfundedness. And that just doesnt happen with Democrats. They just know how to raise taxes and give the money to the people who vote for them. The fact that he is driving people and businesses out of the state that can pay-- doesnt matter. These people think it is their god given right to just tax and tax.

Reply

paul d.

5:44 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012

How exactly does Mr. Malloy explain to us that our crushing debt in this state is not related to our bond rating? And I love the analogy of saving when you are young EXCEPT that we are having to catch up on missed payments over a number of years. And I love the fact that the money will just appear out of thin air, as if it has been there all along. The writer might want to go back and ask where the money is coming from and if the Gov. says he has no idea - a good detail to include I would think.

Reply

Luca Duff Cruz

11:58 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Plus--Malloy says that this announcement has nothing to do with the downgrade.
Awesome bravado.
But honestly, a SMART man would actually say," YES it does have to do with addressing the concerns of the debt rating company that just downgraded us. This hopefully will help us to regain the higher rating so that our borrowing costs are not materially affected."
But-no. Malloy is so used to lying and spinning that he regards anything close to being honest as being dangerous and not a good idea. So, he says No--this has nothing to do with it. Seriously--the guy is such an idiot.
Would anyone in debt make sure that lenders feel as though you are not making attempts to assuage their worries? What is it with this guy?

Reply

Robert Lavelle

8:48 am on Wednesday, January 25, 2012

A look at what Scott Walker has accomplished in Wisconsin could serve as a roadmap for what Malloy should do here.

Reply
Comment_arrow

paul d.

9:31 am on Wednesday, January 25, 2012

I am not sure Scott Walker will have accomplished anything when all is said and done except for inciting a revolt, bringing national negative media coverage to changing labor/union laws, and forcing a recall that could jeopardize many republican candidates an accomplishment.
I would prefer a governor who would start with some clean targets such as longevity preferences in RIF circumstances. Additionally, revisiting and rewriting the laws that govern arbitration and impasse resolution which currently favor unions too heavily. Lastly, eliminating from consideration the peer group effect for union negotiating (when in arbitration) which demands that wages be compared to like industry employers' most recently negotiated contracts which unduly and arbitrarily affect each individual companies' ability to set wages and benefits.

Robert Lavelle

9:42 am on Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Paul, ah yes, all the standard liberal media and union cliches. If you wish to be a shill for union power and higher taxes, count me out of the discussion.

Here are a few paragraphs from a recent WSJ editorial:

"Since last summer, unions have fired every weapon in their arsenal at Mr. Walker and state senators who voted for his collective-bargaining reforms for government workers. Union members must now contribute a very reasonable 5.8% of salary toward pensions and 12.6% toward health insurance, and unions must collect dues from members, rather than having it done by the government. In their pique, Big Labor waged and lost a bitter fight over the election of a state Supreme Court Justice and spent millions trying to recall Republican state senators.

In mid-December, Wisconsin taxpayers got evidence of the direct benefits of reform in their latest property tax bills—an average annual increase of 0.3%, the smallest since 1996. Potential Democratic challengers to Mr. Walker, including Former Dane County Executive Kathleen Falk and Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett, will have to explain why the state should punish Mr. Walker for reforms that are helping taxpayers and local governments save money.

The only loser here are government unions that have less control over state and local politics. With the state no longer automatically withdrawing dues for the unions, labor leaders face the prospect of smaller checkbooks to buy politicians and intimidate reformers."

Reply
Comment_arrow

paul d.

10:36 am on Wednesday, January 25, 2012

I am pretty sure each of my three suggestions would be direct challenges at the current policies regarding collective bargaining and unions. You counter, " If you wish to be a shill for union power and higher taxes, count me out of the discussion."

How are they not?

Standard liberal media? Huh? All I said was that Gov. Walker has given the media so much ammunition that the issues he was confronting got lost.

My main contention with Walker is simple. His approach wouldn't get to the table in CT ( a far more liberal state than WI), so his roadmap would be a road to nowhere. Rather, the Gov should take on narrower targets of the collective bargaining process that will yield results.

To me - that is pragmatism, not idealism. I am a bit fed up with all the idealism or nothing. Said like a fortune cooke, "Perfect has become the enemy of good." Let's start with good.

Luca Duff Cruz

11:24 am on Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Sorry,
But Mr Walker has already accomplished much with his approach to tackling the public unions.
From what I understand, the most significant progress was realized in the schools. Savings, improved test scores owing to a less secure job and therefore greater effort by teachers.
Property taxes went up a scant 0.3% in the last year....the lowest increase in years--.

Local governments became more nimble. Thereby saving money and the State government became more long term solvent.

According to the MciVer Institute local governments in Wisconsin save over 160 mio dollars collectively.

Paul, I suggest that you find out if the Union stronghold in our education helps anyone but unions. Im sure that even teachers will tell you that the work rules prevent them from providing after school help--and place barriers in educating our children.
The media (liberal media) coverage of Scott Walker--attempted to portray Walker's objectives as being overly oppressive and unfair to our "hard working" blue collar types. However, the results that have been seen in such a short time, have curiously gone absent from their reporting. They dont want you to know the gains made. Strange-right?
The recall presents an enormous challenge to the unions to somehow convince voters that they were better off with funding an unsustainable path to disaster and how contributing 5.75% to the pension is unfair--given that not many private employers provide even matching funds anymore for retirement.

Reply

paul d.

11:44 am on Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Joyce- you say, "improved test scores owing to a less secure job and therefore greater effort by teachers" What evidence do you have for this?

Please read my suggestions for improving collective bargaining reform for our Governor and tell me why they do not challenge the current practice in CT. And when you do, please read #1 which talks about the role of seniority (and my view that it should be abolished) when RIF happens.

Reply

Ray D.

7:25 am on Friday, January 27, 2012

Fantasic idea Malloy.. Cut aid to children by 28 million and raise contributions to Public Unions by 125 million.. is this really true?

Reply

Robert Lavelle

9:37 am on Friday, January 27, 2012

Ray, children don't provide campaign dollars . .

Reply
Comment_arrow

paul d.

10:03 am on Friday, January 27, 2012

What? Are you suggesting not paying the debt with your sarcastic remark?

This debt is an obligation of the state. It is not a payment to the unions! It is the already spent dollars (in this case debt obligations) which are crippling our state. It has nothing to do with children until you decide where to get the money from... because the money must come, or our state's rating will really get downgraded to a point where we will be paying astronomical interest compared to states (that can manage their ability to pay).
As the state of CT continually adds even more debt it weakens the view (and then the reality) that we can pay back the money we owe. That is the crux of why Malloy and the legislature have to rein in incurring debt. It is really that simple. But they are also on the hook for funding what the previous admins and legislatures did not fund.

Robert Lavelle

11:12 am on Friday, January 27, 2012

I am suggesting that money is taken from vulnerable people who probably won't react by changing their vote from Democrat, so it's a no-lose move . .

Reply
Comment_arrow

paul d.

11:42 am on Friday, January 27, 2012

That makes absolutely no sense.

Comment_arrow

Ray D.

11:46 am on Friday, January 27, 2012

I agree Bob.. their votes are safe.. Its the evil Republicans who are to blame for taking benefits away from the poor..

Ray D.

11:38 am on Friday, January 27, 2012

Lets have the Public Unions who have occured the debt kick in a little instead of taking it from kids and people in need..can you imagine if this was proposed by a republican.. Ha !! 60 mins would have a field day...

Reply

Ray D.

11:52 am on Friday, January 27, 2012

The promises made to Public Unions are enourmous and unsustainable.. We are out of money and will NOT be able to fullfill the promises made by the politicians of the past

Reply
Comment_arrow

Robert Lavelle

11:59 am on Friday, January 27, 2012

Look at steps being taken in Wisconsin, Indiana, New Jersey, New York, and other states to rein in the unions. Not likely to happen here, though there's always hope . .

Ray D.

12:05 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012

They are passing the point of no return.. it shows you the severity of the situation when a guy like Gov. Cuomo (D)takes on the unions...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Robert Lavelle

12:17 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012

Ray, I would take Cuomo over Malloy in a heartbeat

Leave a comment